State kicks in $400,000 to help JAL market Hawaii
Saturday, December 19, 2009
Friday, March 13, 2009
LAND BABY ! !
ALABAMA, ALASKA, ARIZONA, COLORADO, FLORIDA, GEORGIA,
IDAHO, INDIANA, IOWA, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MARYLAND,
MICHIGAN, MISSISSIPPI, NEBRASKA, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW MEXICO,
NOORTH DAKOTA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA, RHODE
ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA, SOUTH DAKOTA, UTAH, VERMONT, WYO-
MING, THE COMMON WEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS
This of course involves the "ceded lands" case. [Disclosure: we filed an amicus brief in the case, supporting the State's arguments.] This resolution is symbolic, since the Lingle Administration has never appeared to possess any inclination to withdraw the state's request for SCOTUS review, especially after expending a huge amount of legal capital to get the Court to consider the case, including having 29 states and the federal government join as amicus parties supporting the state's argument (as we noted here and here). Nonetheless, the "withdraw the appeal" canard somehow got started, and now apparently has reached a point where it has a life of its own. Even if within the realm of the possible, the Court is hearing oral arguments in the case in less than 38 hours, so it remains highly unlikely that the Lingle Administration will have a last-minute change of heart.
IDAHO, INDIANA, IOWA, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MARYLAND,
MICHIGAN, MISSISSIPPI, NEBRASKA, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW MEXICO,
NOORTH DAKOTA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA, RHODE
ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA, SOUTH DAKOTA, UTAH, VERMONT, WYO-
MING, THE COMMON WEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS
This of course involves the "ceded lands" case. [Disclosure: we filed an amicus brief in the case, supporting the State's arguments.] This resolution is symbolic, since the Lingle Administration has never appeared to possess any inclination to withdraw the state's request for SCOTUS review, especially after expending a huge amount of legal capital to get the Court to consider the case, including having 29 states and the federal government join as amicus parties supporting the state's argument (as we noted here and here). Nonetheless, the "withdraw the appeal" canard somehow got started, and now apparently has reached a point where it has a life of its own. Even if within the realm of the possible, the Court is hearing oral arguments in the case in less than 38 hours, so it remains highly unlikely that the Lingle Administration will have a last-minute change of heart.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
